What we want our government to do and how we pay for it.

Dear Hecate:

I just wanted to thank you for advising us to add a "revenue message" as we lobbied our state legislators for our budget line item this winter. The best part was going in with some of our allies who were lobbying their related budget line item and being able to say -- "We are tired of competing with each other for limited resources and asking you to make "tough choices" between us. We know there is a revenue shortfall and we know you and your colleagues will have to find some new revuenues to be able to keep our programs going and we know that may mean additional taxes. We are asking you is to work with your colleagues to make sure that those taxes are fair, adequate and a stable source of income to pay for the kind of government we want. Every single one of the people we talked to said it was about time they heard this message, and wished more advocates were saying the same thing.

Not afraid to talk Taxes

Dear Not Afraid,

You are very welcome. Nice to know it's working. Now all we have to do is get more people on this little straight talk express.

Our Earmark in the Budget.

Dear Hecate

Why are budget earmarks a dirty word? Our little program is targeted to a very specific population in our community, and our not-so-very-powerful Rep has been able to protect us every year in the budget by "earmarking" some funds for us in the line item that funds programs like ours. In fact the line item is full of earmarks for other programs like ours from all over the state. We all still go through the RFP process, fill out all the forms and fill out all the reports justifying every single penny. We're all subject to audits, we all must make sure our programs meet state standards and follow regulations. We just don't have to compete with each other. I don't get it.

Good guy provider

Dear Good Guy,

Do not spend another second worrying about what anybody else thinks about earmarks. Get to work with your not so powerful Rep and make sure he gets your earmark in his list of priorites to Chairman DeLeo. As you may already know, the Chairman has sent out a letter to all Reps asking them for a letter listing their individual priorities by Feb 11. The letter also asks each Rep to schedule a meeting with the Chairman to justify the list. Now, stop reading this and star putting together the briefing material for your Rep.

What we want our government to do and how we pay for it.

Dear Hecate

Please explain the recent announcements from the Governor's office about their upcoming budget to be released on the 23rd. The initiatives seem pretty well thought out and reasonable to me (especially the one investing in our state parks), but in the light of a well know $ 1 billion structural imbalance, why doesn't he explain how these new initiatives are going to be paid for? It seems to me that the essential task for concerned citizens is to participate in the debate about what we want our state government to do (like advocating for cleaning up the parks) but also be able to participate in the debate about how we're going to pay for it.

Just Asking



Dear Just Asking

I'm sure you've noticed that every press story about every initiative announcement includes a quote or three from a legislative leader or a "state house observer" asking the same question. And the answer will come to everyone on the 23rd or sooner. Will these new initiatives be funded by going into the state's 2.3 billion dollar rainy day fund, or by cutting other programs somewhere else, or from his revenue proposals (gambling and corporate loophole proposals) even if they haven't passed the legislature yet? You’ll find out soon enough. Let me repeat by the way, it’s perfectly legal and appropriate for the Administration to submit an annual budget estimating income from various sources even if they haven’t passed the legislature yet. Of course such a move might really irritate everyone opposed to those revenue sources, but all they have to do is continue their fight in the legislature.

BTW your description of the essential task for concerned citizens is right, excuse me, perfect.

The Massachusetts Budget Process.....What's happening?

Dear Hecate

Our group got the list of budget analysts in the Secretary of Administration and Finance who are developing the Administration's FY 09 Budget from the Public Policy Institute's September Insider Budget Briefing. We've met with a really nice brainiac budget analyst who handles the account that funds our program in November and she told us that we were a priority for the Governor, but warned us that there was a structural budget deficit and it was unlikely we would get what we were asking for. Now we read in the paper every day that the structural deficit is at least 1 billion dollars (on a 30 billion dollar budget) and the Governor may include some revenue options (gaming and closing corporate loopholes) that haven't passed the legislature yet. I thought our state, unlike the federal government had to have a balanced budget?

Baffled in Bridgewater

Dear Baffled,

It really is pretty simple. All of those young brainiacs in the Fiscal affairs Division of the Administration and Finance (who appear younger every year to Hecate) have been burning the midnight oil for weeks doing a fact based analysis of each program and developing a so-called "maintenance" budget for every single state agency.

The Secretary of Administration and Finance adds up all the maintenance budgets and compares that sum to another list of estimated revenues from various taxes and fees submitted by another set of brainiacs and if the total of the maintenance budgets is bigger than the estimated revenues it's called a structural deficit. Now there are a couple of straight forward ways to address a structural deficit that are similar to what every family does, .......cut expenses (maybe not your program, but somebody elses), draw down various "rainey day funds" (your kids college or your retirement savings accounts), or simply plan on some additional revenue streams (a 2nd or 3rd job).

The Governor will be submitting a budget on January 23 that is based on estimated expenses and revenues. First the House and then the Senate will debate the Governor's proposals and come up with their own proposals to solve the structural deficit by either by cutting programs, going into savings or passing the Governor's suggestions for revenue generating measures like gambling, closing corporate loopholes. And yes of course they could come up with their own revenue generating measures. At any rate in the end the Governor has a constitutional obligation to sign a balanced budget.

All of this back and forth can appear to get complex and complicated with at least a dozen ways to explain the same accounting method. You might find it helpful to check out the Mass Budget and Policy Center’s Budget Monitors for straightforward – just - the - facts analysis of the Budget process.

Inside is not the dark side!!!!

Dear Hecate,

You really have to get rid of your attitude about public officials!! There are many of us working as policy analysts or managers of public programs in state and local government who used to be outside advocates representing various special interest groups. And, frankly we honestly feel we have more power to make change than we ever did when we were outside! And we don't have to put up with self rightous purists in our former organizations who are unwilling to say thank you to a public official for an important incremental policy change because they find it "unacceptable" to say thank you for less than the perfect solution. They are their own worst enemy as far as I'm concerned.

Frustrated on Ashburton St.

Dear Frustrated,

Sorry about the attitude. I have always believed that most public officials get into the business because they really want to make a measurable positive change in the the lives of their consitutents. And get credit for it. The identification of and nurturing of inside advocates is one of the most important elements of a winning policy change campaign. Keep at it and thank you in advance.

If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs ............

Dear Hecate:

Our organization has been very grateful for Governor Patrick's public and private support for our programs. We actually got a modest increase in our budget line item, and the administration has been very responsive to a number of our suggestions for improving regulatory policies and streamlining some management practices.
We are now working with budget analysts in the Agency and the Administration and Finance to advocate for some expansion dollars, and we are preparing all of the backup materials to justify the request. (Thanks for your advice on that.)


Now tell us how to respond to some broad hints from our friends in the Administration that they have all been "knee deep" in analyzing the fiscal and human impact of the casino plan, and will be interested in briefing US about that "soon". Our lobbyist is telling us that the casino debate has "sucked the air" out of all the other important policy debates and we should start thinking of reasons to support casinos and even start thinking about earmarking some of the revenues for our programs. YUK!!


Dear Yuk

You know your Runyard Kipling's poem a has some good advice. (Dismiss the gender limiting last line -- Kipling was not the last of the white male imperialists.)

IF
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;

If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:

If you can dream - and not make dreams your master;
If you can think - and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;

If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to broken,
And stoop and build 'em up with wornout tools:

If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;

If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!'

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with kings - nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
If all men count with you, but none too much;

If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds' worth of distance run -
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And - which is more - you'll be a Man my son!

Keep the common touch here, and keep a laser like focus on promoting postive policy change for your constituency, including possibly earmarking casino proceeds to your programs.

The casino debate will be sucking the air out of the State House, but maybe it will also serve to illustrate and illuminate the need for a broader publc debate about all of the revenue streams that fund the governments public programs and infrastructures -- from income taxes to fishing fees to gambling. Been a lot of tax cuts in Massachusetts over the last 15 years or so. And a lot of programs have been slashed because of a shrinking reveues.

Is it time to look at the big picture?